Find Precasters or Suppliers that provide products, equipment and services to make precast concrete.

Traffic-Related Tank Design

An Open Letter to Professional Engineers, Architects and Specifiers

Will a thicker top slab added to a normal-duty grease interceptor or septic tank be durable enough for heavy loads?

By Eric Barger

What’s in a name? Everything – when it’s your name. Your name accompanied by your professional seal attests to the quality of your design. A professional engineering stamp assures your client that your design is compliant with all applicable codes,  standards and regulations – and further that it incorporates accepted engineering practices. In essence, you are saying: “I guarantee it!”

Often it is necessary to install a precast concrete grease interceptor or septic tank in a vehicular traffic area. The temptation for any tank manufacturer is to use existing molds to produce the tank. This temptation is very real, because investment in new molds specifically for traffic-rated applications is costly. Many factors add to the expense of a new traffic-rated product, and new molds are just the beginning of  problems and extra cost relating to traffic-rated tanks.

Heavier traffic-rated precast structures have different requirements

Tanks designed to handle traffic-rated loads have thicker side walls and bottom and  top slabs, and require larger equipment to handle their additional weight. Often the weight of a same-sized capacity tank can double when going from non-traffic-rated to a  traffic-rated application. A new truck, boom and rigging may be required to handle and deliver the larger and heavier traffic-rated tank.

Many tank manufacturers do not have overhead cranes to strip products out of the molds, and if they do, the cranes are generally sized at the limit of their heaviest product. Consequently, introducing a new, much heavier product to the production  line could also mean costly infrastructure upgrades to existing plants. Traffic-rated  product requirements call for more than potential equipment upgrades.

An increase in concrete and a mix design with more portland cement for stronger 28-day ultimate strength are required for traffic-rated design specifications. Rebar must be cut and bent and placed precisely to ensure performance, adding man-hours and material cost to the product. Additional engineering is required to make sure the tank design is of sound quality to address any liability concerns. For a manufacturer, it  can be an overwhelming feeling to consider the additional requirements of a new product, especially one that varies greatly from anything produced in the past.

Increasing top slab thickness isn’t the answer

Faced with the purchase of expensive new equipment and additional labor and  material costs, a scenario like this may typically occur: The previously mentioned product requirements and related costs lead some manufacturers to use existing  molds and increase the thickness of the top slab in order to forgo the additional expenses of adding a new tank to the product line. In this scenario, a tank with a  thicker top slab is delivered and put in traffic-rated service without any further thought.

For every manufacturer watching their bottom line, holding investment cost down by not having a traffic-rated mold for every non-traffic-rated mold on the production floor may seem economically prudent. Many manufacturers fear losing a sale to a  competitor because an engineered traffic-rated tank may be as much as two-and-one-half times the cost of a non-traffic-rated tank offered by a competitor who does not follow responsible industry practices.

Can existing molds designed to produce structures for non-vehicular loads be engineered to accommodate H20 traffic loads? Is this a safe and responsible practice, or is having separate product molds designed specifically for traffic-rated loads even  necessary?

Entire precast structure carries the wheel load

What is HS20? HS20 loading is defined by the American Association of Highway and  Transportation Officials (AASHTO) as a vehicle with an 8,000-pound (3,630 kg) front axle and one or more rear axles weighing 32,000 pounds (14,500 kg) each and spaced at least 14 feet (4.3 m) apart. Since the axle spacing is greater than the tank width,  HS20 and H20 may be used interchangeably.

The entire precast tank is affected by the live wheel load and not just the top slab.  Wheels adjacent to the tank result in a lateral surcharge force in addition to normal soil loads, and the upward bearing pressure applied to the bottom slab is the reaction  in response to all of the downward forces combined, including the tank self-weight, soil loads above the tank lid, and all live loads.

A typical 1,500 gallon (5,680 L) non-traffic-rated tank with monolithic partition wall was chosen as the test subject for analyzing how non-traffic-rated tanks perform under live vehicle loading (Figure 1). This example is an actual precast concrete tank design  that has been in use for more than 15 years as a non-traffic-rated tank. The lid  thickness is 6 inches (150 mm) with an average wall thickness of 4 inches (100 mm)  and a bottom slab thickness of 4 inches.

When the original design in Figure 1 was made, the thought of placing the tank in traffic areas was not an issue. But as land becomes more valuable and space utilized for parking becomes increasingly larger, the need to install a grease interceptor under a  parking space or vehicular traffic area becomes greater. The liability aspect alone is  enough to deter some manufacturers from producing a tank that can handle such loads altogether. It is a fact that tanks have collapsed in commercial drive-through  lanes, private yards and parking lots where vehicular traffic was present but where the underground tank was not engineered or built for such live load applications.

Can non-traffic-rated tanks be successfully modified?

Engineering analysis demonstrates the tank design shown in Figure 1, initially  designed for non-traffic use, can be made into a HS20 traffic-rated tank with careful engineering and many preconditions. Delta Engineers, Architects & Surveyors of  Endwell, N.Y., performed the engineering analysis. The eight conditions are as follows:

1. 1 to 2 feet (0.3 to 0.6 m) of soil shall be over the top of the tank.
2. No more than one axle or two wheels shall be over
the tank at any one time.
3. The minimum concrete strength will be 5,000 psi (35
MPa) compressive strength.
4. The top slab thickness shall be increased to 6.5
inches (165 mm). However, the bottom slab and wall
thicknesses cannot be modified.
5. The tank contains a monolithic compartment wall.
6. The water table shall be at least 3 feet (0.9 m) below
grade when the tank is empty.
7. The walls are supported at the roof by an interlocking
recess that is cast into the top slab.
8. Reinforcing bar size, spacing and location shall be
installed per Professional Engineer recommendation.

Who is responsible when site use changes?

With a maximum burial depth of 2 feet (0.6 m), it is clear that the versatility of the  tank in this analysis would be useful only in a narrow range of applications. There is a concern when burying a tank in a traffic area that the site may be razed in the future  and/or the use may change. A business changing from a gas station to a truck stop would be an example of a drastic change that could cause the listed preconditions to  be invalidated and the tank design to be inadequate in that situation. Designing for the worst-case scenario is not practical from an engineering or economics perspective.

Manufacturers today must address failures and costly litigation when an underground tank collapses or is damaged. For the future, specifying thicker side walls and bottom and top slabs will enable engineers to design a traffic-rated tank such that everyone  can rest easy. When site conditions change years after today’s tank is installed, will you be willing to accept the responsibility and possible litigation that would follow a  structural failure?

When specifying traffic-rated tanks, many factors come in to play, and the last thing the industry needs is for a tank not designed for HS20 traffic ratings to be installed below a fast-food drive-through. A design that incorporates HS20 traffic loading along  with the appropriate overburden depth and riser concentrated loads has to be taken into account when approving tanks for installation. Each of the eight assumptions listed are critical to the satisfactory performance of the modified traffic-rated tank  when subjected to the loading conditions as described. Remember, the only way to verify that a tank is traffic-rated is to see the structural design stamped and signed by a  licensed Professional Engineer in good standing that states the maximum design capacity in writing.

Eric Barger is president of Barger & Sons Inc. (www.BargerAndSons.com), a precast  concrete manufacturer based in Lenoir City, Tenn. He currently serves on NPCA’s board of directors as well as NPCA’s Educational Foundation.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>